Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Useful Oracle books - C.J. Date theory vs. practicality

Re: Useful Oracle books - C.J. Date theory vs. practicality

From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_optusnet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:32:35 +1000
Message-ID: <40B73163.20703@optusnet.com.au>

> troubles that relate to them. It is important to understand that null might
> mean "We don't know this property of this entity." OR it might mean "This

NULL means NULL and preciously NOTHING else. You cannot EVER assign a presumed meaning to something that means nothing.

> single person, being a good example.) I'd personally like to see extensions to
> SQL to handle these subtleties. The subtleties are there, however, whether we

The extensions are there: they are called default values. And value constraints.

As soon as you append a value to the notion of NULL, it stopped being a NULL and is now a special case. Which you should handle using the value constraints.

The problem is that people CONTINUALLY refuse to believe that NULL means exactly that: nothing. And NULL more!

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision_at_optusnet.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri May 28 2004 - 07:29:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US