Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ora-4031 & large_pool

Re: ora-4031 & large_pool

From: Fuad Arshad <fuadar_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 13:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20040518200450.71680.qmail@web80503.mail.yahoo.com>


Terry ,
I remember having this problem on one of my 8i instances so this may or may not solve your problem. It had something to do with shared_pool_reserved_size being smaller then the shared_pool_reserved_min_alloc .

since the shared_pool_reserved_size controls the size of shared_pool reserved for large allocation it overflows to the large pool.

this being said we were not using mts not rman at that time.  

Terry Sutton <terrysutton_at_usa.net> wrote: One of our clients is getting the following error occasionally on a 9.2.0.3 DB: ORA-04031: unable to allocate 8704 bytes of shared memory ("large pool","unknown object","hash-join subh","kllcqas:kllsltba")

The large pool is set at 16M, which isn't high, but they shouldn't be using the large pool at all. The don't use MTS, they don't use parallel query or have parallel_automatic_tuning set to true, and they don't use RMAN. AFAIK, those are the only things which use the large pool.

Any ideas?

--Terry



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 16:21:54 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US