Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 9i RAC or 10g RAC ?

RE: 9i RAC or 10g RAC ?

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:07:11 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E93953@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>


Yes, GFS would be nice. I've also been waiting for a beta of Veritas' = CFS for Linux since December '03, but it's still a no-show.

I haven't messed with OCFS since v1.08, but it indeed was scary then. = It flat out refused to work under RH9 (AS2.1 wouldn't support our = hardware and we didn't want to spend $ on AS3), until I hacked it with a = modified RH9 patch for JFS. Like Oracle says, OCFS is only meant to = handle Oracle datafiles for RAC and nothing else. And they mean it. = Oracle PIO performance was so bad (~1M/s), that I dumped OCFS in favor = of raw. I did see a presentation of Wim's on OTN about some tips on = implementing OCFS that I didn't do, such as the OCFS versions of cp, dd, = etc., but I don't see what that would have to do with Oracle PIO = performance.

I see that OCFS has newer versions now. Perhaps it performs better now, = or perhaps it's just easier to get it to perform. If you want RAC to = install easily (and probably run like it was meant to), try it out on = OpenVMS. Has anyone here tried RAC on an OpenVMS cluster? It looks = (*looks*) like it's a no-brainer setup, thanks to the most mature and = stable clustering around. :)

Rich

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:00 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: 9i RAC or 10g RAC ?

>=20
>=20
>=20

> Anyone have any ideas on when/if Oracle will start supporting GFS? =
=3D
> Since Redhat bought them I would believe it is only a matter of time =
=3D
> before it is supported by Oracle. My understanding is that it is a =
=3D
> solid clustered filesystem technology, I'm still a little=20
> weary of OCFS.


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed May 12 2004 - 09:11:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US