RE: Wrong results using decode when db upgraded to 9205

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 14:23:00 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E9391B@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>

Whew! Good thing that's gone. Has anyone messed with OiD in 10g? (I'm = assuming that's the replacement) Hopefully replication has become = stable, because in 9.0 it flat out didn't work (on Linux at least).

I'm Rich Jesse and I approve of this message.

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:14 PM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: Wrong results using decode when db upgraded to 9205
>
> It isn't! It does have my full moral support. Oracle names=20
> is, tragically,
> not only unsupported, but gone, as in "no more".

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed May 05 2004 - 14:21:00 CDT