| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
You are saying the avg row size is one byte? (sorry seems weird)
You don't need to partition a table to use PDML!
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net [mailto:ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:12 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
yes and 95% of the data we don't need. Not allowed to get rid of it, = because its too close to our release date, wasn't allowed to work on the = ETL process until the last minute, so I'm in a bind. :(. We could shrink = many of these tables down by about 90% if we dumped the unneeded data. = There are 208 columns in one and we need like 8 of them.=20
not that I'm complaining or anything.=20
>=20
>=20
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:18:19 CDT
 |
 |