RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

From: Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <42BBD772AC30EA428B057864E203C999113FD1@MSGBOSCLF2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM>

So you have average row size =3D 1 ?

Waleed

-----Original Message-----

From: ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net [mailto:ryan.gaffuri_at_cox.net] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:27 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

We have a table which is about 8GB with about 8 billion records. We add = deltas to the file daily(inserts,updates,deletes).

We are considering paritioning this table so we can use parallel DML. We = are considering partitioning on the primary key to about 10-20 = partitions.=20

Has anyone used hash sub-partitioning? What are your experiences with = that? I'd like to have granularity smaller than 400-800 MB per = partition.=20

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/

FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com


----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org

put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:28:51 CDT