locally managed with autoallocation

From: Adams, Matthew (GE Consumer & Industrial) <MATT.ADAMS_at_APPL.GE.COM>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:36:47 -0500
Message-ID: <F2AE82A3FD89334EA21F6C761C541A70678FA8@ap3expr06applge.appl.ge.com>

I know we are WAY behind the times here, still using dictionary managed tablespaces for everything. I'm starting to evaluate methods for setting up tablespaces and have to ask this:

Why would anyone use autoallocation with locally managed tablespaces when it appears to be open to the same kind of honeycombing fragmentation problems that exist with dictionary tablespaces that don't use uniform extent sizes?

Natt

---

Matt Adams - GE Appliances - matt.adams_at_appl.ge.com When I'm around hard-core computer geeks, I want to say, 'Come outside -- the graphics are great!'

• Matt Weinhold

  ---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:36:30 CST