RE: Redo Copy Latch contention ??

From: Reddy, Madhusudana <Madhusudana.Reddy_at_bestbuy.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 12:29:00 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.005C1017.20030702122036@fatcity.com>

Thanks Kirti,
We have HP Openview implemented on our database and hence got some alert on redo copy latch. When I have queried the database I found the contention on this latch. Yes we have other performance issues ( HIGH CPU utilization , because of lotta bad code ). and We are checking every possible contention on the database.

Question : How can I determine if this redo copy latch is causing the performance issues , guess that is my main question before altering some hidden parameter in init.ora.

Madhu Reddy
X13944

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

According that suggestion you do seem to have redo copy latch contention. As far as getting that ratio close to suggested value, you may set some special init.ora
parameters. There is plenty of notes on Metalink for that. But, you should first determine if this is causing any performance issue. Have you explored all
other avenues to address those issues. If not, I would not worry about this contention.

Kirti
- "Reddy, Madhusudana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  > Hello ALL,
  >
  > Do you guys think we have redo copy latch contention ?? Also what are your
  > suggestions on tuning
  > Redo Copy Latch ??
  >
  >
  > SUBSTR(LN.NAME,1,20) GETS
  > MISSES IMMEDIATE_GETS IMMEDIATE_MISSES
  > -------------------- ----------
  > ---------- -------------- ----------------
  > redo allocation
  > 943350646 8862115 0 0
  > redo copy
  > 22097 497 907958724 1592481
  >
  > 14:54:54 SQL> select (497/22097)*100 from dual;
  >
  > (497/22097)*100 ~ (misses/gets)*100
  > ---------------
  > 2.2491741 <------- Oracle suggests it
  > should be under 1%
  >
  >
  > Madhu Reddy
  > X13944
  >
  >
  > --
  > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  > --
  > Author: Reddy, Madhusudana
  > INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >
  > Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  > San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
  > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Kirtikumar Deshpande
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Reddy, Madhusudana
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Received on Wed Jul 02 2003 - 14:29:00 CDT