Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: PCTUSED - when is block added to freelist?

RE: PCTUSED - when is block added to freelist?

From: Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 15:10:22 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004C6C59.20020903151022@fatcity.com>


1- Delete means freeing space.
2- When the used space in the blocks falls below PCTUSED, the block needs to go back to the free list.
3- This requires extra processing cost.
4- So lowering PCTUSED will lower the frequency of triggering this procedure.

Waleed

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 6:39 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

I have one huge table (takes up about 30% of the total database storage) which has a monthly batch deletion of old data. I had PCTFREE and PCTUSED set to the defaults of 10 and 40 respectively.

I occurred to me that I could probably free up a lot more space by increasing the PCTUSED so that more blocks would be available to be written to (since getting more storage for the server is a bureaucratic nightmare here).

So my question is, if I just raise the PCTUSED from 40 to, say, 75 would all blocks that fall into the 40-75 range become available for inserts? Or is it only after their next update or delete?

Different sections of the docs seem to imply different things. The docs say:

A lower PCTUSED reduces processing costs incurred during UPDATE and DELETE statements for moving a block to the free list when the block has fallen below that percentage of usage.

This seems to imply that it won't be moved to the freelist until a delete or update is done that affects that block.

But they also say:

A higher PCTUSED increases processing cost during INSERTs and UPDATEs.

This seems to imply that when it's looking to do the insert it might find that it can insert to a block.

Anyway, why would a lower PCTUSED reduce processing costs during a DELETE but a higher PCTUSED wouldn't increase processing costs during a DELETE. That makes no sense. I'm befuddled.

TIA,
Jay Miller

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Miller, Jay
  INET: JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Khedr, Waleed
  INET: Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM
Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Sep 03 2002 - 18:10:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US