Oracle-L: RE: Oracle 9.2 Stability Feedback Requested

From: Molina, Gerardo <Gerardo.Molina_at_Schwab.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:03:39 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004BA378.20020820110339@fatcity.com>

Currently running 64-bit 9.2.0.1 on Solaris 2.8 on a development environment.

So far so good. Stability/reliability of 9.2 will depend on which options/features you are planning to use, however.

HTH,
Gerardo

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Can anybody tell me what the track record has been for Oracle 9.2? Has it been reliable and stable?

We have clients asking us about Oracle 9.2 and I would like to gather some experience from the field on how reliable it has been.

Most of our clients are running Windows NT/2000, some are running UNIX. Appreciate any feedback anybody can provide.

Thanks a lot.

Sam Bootsma, OCP
Technical Support Analyst
samb_at_cpas.com

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Sam Bootsma
INET: SamB_at_cpas.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Molina, Gerardo
INET: Gerardo.Molina_at_Schwab.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------