Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Query Optimization of the future...

RE: Query Optimization of the future...

From: Deshpande, Kirti <kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:03:33 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004B60B0.20020815070333@fatcity.com>


Thanks, Tim.  

I thought it was pretty 'interesting' response from Oracle Marketing ;)  

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Good post, Kirti!  

Quote...  

"Oracle Corp. says its customers are moving toward data stores of huge size and complexity, spread over multiple locations. The company says its products will not only evolve to handle those kinds of jobs, but will also do them extraordinarily well. "Over the next couple of releases, we'll see essentially fully autonomous databases," says Robert Shimp, vice president of database marketing."  

---
 
Well, he had to say *something* after IBM and Microsoft had such cool things
to announce and discuss.  Assuming the past record of 3-5 years on average
between releases, the "next couple releases" will take 6-15 years or so.
Personally, by that time I'll be expecting artificial intelligence, rather
than just *autonomy*.  Of course, I'm also expecting to be dead, too...
 
It's clear that the basic research efforts by both IBM and Microsoft
continue to bear fruit.  IBM has a decades-old tradition of pushing its
people to PhD research, while Microsoft has just gotten started relatively
recently.  To my knowledge, Oracle does not have a similar program within,
does it?
 
Nevertheless, Oracle has made a living exploiting publicly available basic
research (starting with its origins) and luring people from elsewhere
(remember Informix's lawsuit some years ago?).  As IBM, AT&T, and Xerox will
attest, its really tough to keep basic research under wraps for
exploitation...
 
Still, LEO and "stream queries" aren't necessary very far off in Oracle.
Well, maybe LEO is, but not "stream queries" when you consider the
underlying aspects of external tables...
 
----- Original Message ----- 
kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <  <mailto:ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:28 AM



> Interesting article on Query Optimization research..
>
<http://www.computerworld.com/databasetopics/data/software/story/0,10801,731 6> http://www.computerworld.com/databasetopics/data/software/story/0,10801,7316
> 4,00.html
>
> - Kirti
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <http://www.orafaq.com>
http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Deshpande, Kirti
> INET: <mailto:kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com> kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: <mailto:ListGuru_at_fatcity.com> ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT
spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Deshpande, Kirti INET: kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Aug 15 2002 - 10:03:33 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US