Oracle-L: RE: local partition index question

From: Toepke, Kevin M <ktoepke_at_trilegiant.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:54:52 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00427A3C.20020313105452@fatcity.com>

Yes. This is true -- even in Oracle 9i

Caver

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Hi all,

I am new to partition and I was told the following statement and I couldn't verify it in the doc. Could someone please tell me if it's true or not?

"The partition column must be included in the primary key for the resulting unique index to be locally partitioned."

Thanks

MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: oracle dba
INET: oracle12i_at_hotmail.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Toepke, Kevin M
INET: ktoepke_at_trilegiant.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------