Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle Future??? - from the darkside

RE: Oracle Future??? - from the darkside

From: Henry Poras <Henry.Poras_at_ctp.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:17:59 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003E9E1A.20020108094038@fatcity.com>

Where
I am the management focus (I've got to find a better word) changed so frequently from UNIX to NT to anything but MicroSoft that just the slightest bit of inertia in migrating meant that nothing ever changed. The major effect was seen on new installations/purchases made during the Fad of the Day. <SPAN
class=431543617-08012002> 
<SPAN
class=431543617-08012002>Henry

<FONT face=Tahoma

  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Bowes, Chris   [mailto:Chris.Bowes_at_kosa.com]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:51   AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:   Oracle Future??? - from the darkside
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002>Actually, It's possible.  Maybe not down to 5%,   but if y'all don't think that Oracle is ripe for a market defeat, then you   need to take a hard look at our industry...  Take here for   example.  We had Oracle here everywhere.  We have Oracle   programmers, DBA's, etc.  Then, we get a new CEO.  Fresh out of   Harvard (where they obviously know everything), he went to company "A"   and they had sqlserver.  When he left company "A" and came

  here, guess what we were ordered to convert EVERYTHING to.  
  Well, everything except SAP.  Oracle will be out of here by 2003.  
  Gone, Bye Bye.  C'ya, don't want to be ya.  Oracle personnel that 
  don't cross train or haven't shown the ability to cross train are gone   too.  The only thing we had to say about it was "Luke, I am your father,   where are the sqlserver discs?"  In one month, 6 years of oracle   development was ordered to be out within 2 years.
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
  The
  sad fact is that the Jared Still's and Steve Adam's are not making the   decisions in enough companies.  There are too many managers way up the   food chain who have no clue that the marketing hype they is pure   BS.  They buy the spin and make the decisions based on that.     The fact that sqlserver cannot out perform Oracle is not relevant.  The   fact that sqlserver can only run on NT/2000/XP is not relevant.  It   will actually be sold as a positive.  "Ya, know, most mcse's are   also mcDba's too..."  It may not be true, but facts are not where   the decision will be made.  Marketing hype is.  When the "cost   savings" is put into the manager's head, the decision will be made.  By   the time that the facts of the performance and headaches and costs   of conversion are pointed out, people will bury it and forget it   existed.  "After all, it is just a computer and I am not going to risk   my job arguing over a computer decision. Besides, the IT folks   can do anything..."  Remember, spending 2 million to convert to something   that will save 100K a year thereafter, is a SAVINGS in the eyes of an upper   manager. 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002>Other companies I have worked for are doing the same   thing.  Marketing drives the industry now (look at SAP).    Too many idiots.  Not enough voices of reason.   I   don't expect Oracle to lose their share to 5%, but if they don't start   fighting better, they will have serious competition from sqlserver and other   areas.
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002>--Chris
<A

  href="mailto:chris.bowes_at_kosa.com">chris.bowes_at_kosa.com
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> 
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002> <FONT color=#0000ff   face=Arial size=2>
<SPAN

  class=154304215-08012002>--Chris
<A

  href="mailto:Chris.Bowes_at_Kosa.com">Chris.Bowes_at_Kosa.com    
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr
  style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">-----Original   Message-----From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On   Behalf Of Denham EvaSent: 08 January 2002 14:25To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Oracle   Future???
  Hi Folks,   

  Wonder if anyone
  would like to comment, my MSSQL DBA sent me a couple of emails from a MSSQL   mailing list, they were discussing the future of MSSQL.   Some of the
  comments included comments about our DB - Oracle. <FONT   face="Courier New" size=2>I've added two here...   ...With Hyperion
  been seriously challenged and overrun by Analysis Services, oracle will   completely die out as they integrate their current offering into Oracle9i.   ....
  ...Oracle will
  become another Apple: 5% market share. ...   Do you guys
  agree? Is Oracle doing anything about the very serious threat that MSSQL is   placing on their market share?
  No, plans of
  changing personally, but wondering if cross education won't be   beneficial:)
  Regards
  Denham      

  This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared   by MailMarshal - For more
  information please visit <A
  href="http://www.marshalsoftware.com">www.marshalsoftware.com       Received on Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:17:59 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US