RE: Real-life Stand-by DB implementation stories?

From: Martin Kendall <Martin.Kendall_at_Rubus.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:28:53 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.002F346F.20010426104354@fatcity.com>

Hi Earl,

The problem I have found recently is getting management to understand that a Standby DB has to be exclusively Standby for it to be as up to date as poss.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: 26 April 2001 17:06
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Anyone implemented SBDBs recenetly? A client is comparing them to a cluster solution involving Fail-Safe. We are recommending SBDB and trying to go to 817 also (on 80521 now).

Also this is NT if that makes a difference.

Thanks,

Earl

Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: The Oracle DBA
INET: theoracledba_at_lycos.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Martin Kendall
INET: Martin.Kendall_at_Rubus.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------