Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Best Extent Size for Locally Managed Temporary Tablespaces

Best Extent Size for Locally Managed Temporary Tablespaces

From: Steve Orr <sorr_at_arzoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:46:48 -0700
Message-Id: <10530.109584@fatcity.com>


In the old Oracle7 world the recommended practice was to make initial and next extent sizes to be a multiple of SORT_AREA_SIZE plus 1 DB block. I guess the thinking was that if a sort needed to move from memory to disk then it could fit neatly into the next extent.

So lets say:
SORT_AREA_SIZE = 512K and
sort_area_retained_size = 64K

Any ideas for deriving the best extent size for a locally managed temporary tablespace? Or do you think it no longer makes a difference?

Can we "SORT" this out?

Steve Orr
Fremont, CA Received on Fri Jun 16 2000 - 12:46:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US