Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.68.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Roy Hann <specially@processed.almost.meat>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Hashing for DISTINCT or GROUP BY in SQL
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:13:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <i92fgp$vks$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <ecfb8461-259a-4ad5-b4e9-8daf012ae3b8@g17g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <80313ee0-3396-4c09-9c00-403159459167@26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fUEh9+sMLTMq2OZR54fPQw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: XPN/1.0.0 (Monkey Business ; Windows)
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl

Tegiri Nenashi wrote:

> Speaking SQL, some of the "big 3" vendors still code in C,
> but that is another story...

C is less awful than a lot of the alternatives.  At least is doesn't get
all knotted up over "objects", whatever they are.

-- 
Roy


