Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!postnews.google.com!a11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Brian <brian@selzer-software.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: RM VERY STRONG SUGGESTION 4: TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <a07acbac-ea49-4192-98e2-d7d3cce6581a@a11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References: <caa226c8-ee20-4799-af65-2e126cc2d07f@z28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <a65d540c-26e4-4acc-9c06-cab884916cb2@u4g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <01b3645a-db9c-4d9d-84b9-6eee11310ee8@x24g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
 <4c86b92c$0$14123$703f8584@textnews.kpn.nl> <1IAho.604$89.147@edtnps83>
 <d4c39ee9-455c-4f3a-9817-c63cbfcba78c@u13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <a373d882-11a7-49eb-a912-a52b51193389@t11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.73.73.118
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1284066795 21303 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2010 21:13:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a11g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.73.73.118; posting-account=AE9LXgoAAACF8PIhanDAmLcShUHywety
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET CLR
 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3),gzip(gfe)
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl

On Sep 9, 1:08=A0pm, Erwin <e.sm...@myonline.be> wrote:
> On 9 sep, 04:41, Brian <br...@selzer-software.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When I'm wrong, I admit that I'm wrong. =A0I don't think I'm wrong, and
> > nobody has offerred an irrefutable argument that proves me wrong;
> > therefore, I have to conclude that I'm right.
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> Intricate that in this particular case, all of a sudden you DO make
> the switch to 2VL, eliminating the possibility that your-being-right-
> or-wrong might still be unknown.

I never switched away from 2VL.  You just assume that I had.  You are
wrong.