Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad!news.aliant.net!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:44:23 -0300
From: Bob Badour <bbadour@pei.sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: more on delete from join
References: <IPWjm.40275$Db2.30224@edtnps83> <8b751f60-779b-4cdd-8361-8ab27cdc4ea0@e27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> 	<52Ylm.41248$Db2.9996@edtnps83> <b23154ca-cdc3-4570-bc1a-aa4c2a036d87@o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> 	<4a986869$0$23762$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <c1d987c5-bfea-4c31-a97a-7271c08a3869@d21g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> 	<4a993f13$0$23766$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <385686bf-7bdc-4ba8-9233-377d94ed7e4a@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> 	<cb3a626b-70c1-44ca-aec2-7a65cb69aa45@h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> 	<K8qdnVRh-MdWHATXnZ2dnUVZ_h2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <2b128d1f-7303-4890-b591-45868329f4d9@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> 	<486f53f2-10fd-4d4b-af45-be256f187ed3@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com> 	<4a9ade0b$0$23762$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <7669561e-6451-4638-89fc-c5ac24375323@o36g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> 	<4a9af020$0$23747$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <52f143b7-f232-4c45-9acc-86c660ffeed5@m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <52f143b7-f232-4c45-9acc-86c660ffeed5@m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090830-0, 08/30/2009), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <4a9bebb6$0$23758$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.68.106.37
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aliant.net
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl

Marshall wrote:

> On Aug 30, 2:44 pm, Bob Badour <bbad...@pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
>>No. Both base tables and views are named relation variables. They have
>>to be because their values vary over time.
> 
> This is certainly true in the data management viewpoint, but I
> could also imagine a relational programming that allowed either
> to be unnamed.
> 
> This is admittedly a very obscure point.

The unnamed case is just an equation or an expression as in x+y=1
