Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!81.171.88.15.MISMATCH!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!postnews.google.com!w9g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: DBMS_Plumber <paul_geoffrey_brown@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <63e57411-ec13-4556-9d6c-a9e90ae9b431@w9g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
References: <bf7e8cca-4cbc-4a8c-b452-1bacb4846b8e@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> 
 <4a2d3b7b$0$23779$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <50df6983-ba3b-4604-994a-89b595775ea5@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> 
 <4a2e05fc$0$23770$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <e0e5c65b-16b8-4d73-ae2e-cc0976ce9550@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com> 
 <61940522-4566-4b27-be4f-ad8afcbf803f@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> 
 <NdRYljMVNmLKFwKH@shrdlu.com> <94549771-02a8-4089-beb7-95dadb3ec676@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.41.59.154
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245724213 18988 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2009 02:30:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:30:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: w9g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.41.59.154; 
 posting-account=f9_sxwkAAAAv9yJm2NkOZbNMpGV73MpF
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; 
 rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060214 Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl

On Jun 9, 7:53=A0am, Jan Hidders <hidd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 3:27=A0pm, Bernard Peek <b...@shrdlu.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In message
> > <61940522-4566-4b27-be4f-ad8afcbf8...@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
> > cim...@hotmail.com writes
>
> > >Snipped
>
> > >> The database community can handle this in a couple of ways:
>
> > >> 1) Close in on yourself and mock people who do not have the
> > >> =A0 =A0insights you have.
> > >> 2) Recognize the problem and help sort out the misunderstandings
> > >> =A0 =A0and snags.
>
> > >> Over the past couple of days I have got a clear impression about
> > >> what approach seems to be preferred by the regulars here.
> > >Let me get this straight. =A0You need help from the database community
> > >for a design exercice but you need that help to be done according to
> > >the principles you believe are universal (whatever these may be). =A0A=
ll
> > >I have seen so far are goodwill people who wanted to help you by
> > >advising you to do some reading necessary to understand some basic
> > >principles of database design. =A0In a word, you ask a question and
> > >because you don't like the answer you now imply that the *regulars*
> > >have closed themselves and mocked you.
>
> > >Don't you think this is a hasty harsh judgment on your part ?
>
> > I've been reading and posting to this newsgroup on and off for years. I
> > think his analysis is pretty accurate.
>
> Unfortunately it is.
>
> -- Jan Hidders

Lemme add my voice to the amen chorus.

"i don't know anything about quantum mechanics I only know about how
to build a chicken hutch can you guys help me understand background
radiation and hawking radiation and stuff and please use words i know
from build chicken hutches"
