Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Cimode <cimode@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <d50941db-78be-4307-88f7-a9cca370b832@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
References: <4a2edac9$0$27727$703f8584@news.kpn.nl> <4a2ee2f5$0$23770$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> 
 <4a2ee73f$0$8599$703f8584@news.kpn.nl> <ueqt255qoso490pfdcsm4qg29i0cl0d2es@4ax.com> 
 <4a2efe38$0$23755$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> <dd6ee9e8-7c1f-4297-ba67-2efb48393706@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> 
 <BdEXl.31227$PH1.5661@edtnps82> <4a2f194e$0$23784$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net> 
 <b51906ee-09d0-4658-94a3-46a0428d306f@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> 
 <k6pv2594euv1fpj92h7olon9rffu73lljo@4ax.com> <55da3239-a3ec-4c70-aa46-02cb3adeae2a@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> 
 <4053b19a-2adc-4c9d-a0c5-00f255a4afab@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> 
 <f022fd34-38ad-4776-939f-ead2513979d7@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> 
 <89f0d5d2-5fab-44ce-876f-16c08070f608@t11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> 
 <e3a5593c-f54e-4bb0-b49c-90953d456b4d@x31g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.230.226.33
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244752620 2207 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2009 20:37:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.230.226.33; 
 posting-account=ICwiDwoAAADmc5U6HcJXmtqEzRkHXlWU
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; fr-fr) 
 AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.20.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl


> Given your thoughtful replies, I was wrong to have singled you out.
Thank you for this intellectual honnesty.

Just keep in mind that there are usually always hidden reasons to take
strong positions.

Regards