Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps82.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: paul c <toledobythesea@oohay.ac>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
References: <7ahPl.1491$5F2.1234@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <2_uTl.1220$9L2.172@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> 	<355a5c7c-7357-47ef-a807-629f1a42025e@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com> 	<2vzTl.1285$9L2.309@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <dQzTl.28380$Db2.939@edtnps83> 	<a690920a-f67f-4b26-9f4f-f1be0712fd05@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> 	<muITl.29743$PH1.4466@edtnps82> <240dbf10-2281-4faf-a787-750ca8bdd642@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> 	<kNRTl.29773$PH1.5537@edtnps82> <d715ca2e-ad3d-4cf3-b0ff-2e71ccf2a4a3@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com> 	<CPSTl.29789$PH1.26921@edtnps82> <e28e2d47-5157-4039-a884-b788539c409c@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> 	<csWTl.28526$Db2.27686@edtnps83> <a7c5f993-6c7e-4ba8-8d69-57725388f15b@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com> 	<US0Ul.28567$Db2.7806@edtnps83> <fb2fdf89-565d-4aa9-8a5b-7529015561f1@z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 	<4w2Ul.29995$PH1.8214@edtnps82> <5ca14f1d-8e3e-4cd9-9950-419270888987@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ca14f1d-8e3e-4cd9-9950-419270888987@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <W0wUl.30128$PH1.18031@edtnps82>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 13:57:10 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.155.111.127
X-Trace: edtnps82 1243778230 75.155.111.127 (Sun, 31 May 2009 07:57:10 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:57:10 MDT
Xref:  news.cambrium.nl

David BL wrote:
...
> For someone not interested in conversation that's a long winded way of
> saying you don't want to answer the question.  I suspect you won't
> because you can't.
> 

Don't worry about reasons you can't comprehend, something will turn up. 
  There are posters here who can see a point in the most outrageous 
claptrap, usually the same point.  If people avoided fields they have 
little aptitude for, there would be a shortage of doctors and probably 
the sexes would never marry.  There are some calm, self-aware stoics I 
admire for being able to mimic a discipline just enough that their 
disasters are limited to one or two a year.  It's the hardest thing to 
see one's own limits.