Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:34:58 GMT
Message-ID: <C7P_i.210295$Da.77733_at_pd7urf1no>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:34:58 GMT
Message-ID: <C7P_i.210295$Da.77733_at_pd7urf1no>
Marshall wrote:
...
> You didn't say an attribute *has* a name and a domain. You said
> an attribute *is* a name and a domain. So you can have two
> different attributes with the same name.
He did mention "unique" which I took to mean what D&D expressed as something like "no two attributes have the same name". While I'd like his material to be less dependent on English nuances, as a draft exercise, I'd say the guy has a fair excuse. Received on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 04:34:58 CET