Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!noris.net!news.buerger.net!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!64.233.178.134.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Cimode <cimode@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Date: 5 May 2007 12:54:48 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <1178394888.610941.137490@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <6ui_h.5979$YW4.662@trndny06>
   <VBk_h.20774$Um6.2594@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
   <oQm_h.7170$dy2.2840@trndny01>
   <4639fde8$0$4017$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>
   <Wko_h.6617$r77.5046@trndny08>
   <1178211370.791765.118760@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <Amq_h.6838$2v1.5163@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>
   <1178221012.371056.145700@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <Adv_h.7164$rO7.6407@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
   <1178260494.811737.293620@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
   <eFF_h.7202$rO7.3983@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
   <QvJ_h.11$rk5.8@trndny06>
   <8kY_h.7025$2v1.1573@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>
   <dL__h.1686$XZ2.1572@trndny01>
   <1178376836.208957.255990@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
   <wa3%h.2390$XG1.633@trndny07>
   <1178389295.897789.225590@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <wY4%h.7410$rO7.5868@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.230.226.33
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178394888 18698 127.0.0.1 (5 May 2007 19:54:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <wY4%h.7410$rO7.5868@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; fr; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.230.226.33;
   posting-account=XWbNBg0AAABXMdLVqoM3R9n-RIU90_cb
Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.theory:43807

On 5 mai, 21:31, "Brian Selzer" <b...@selzer-software.com> wrote:
> "Cimode" <cim...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[Snipped]
> Short of that, I don't think you can avoid both nulls and logical
> decomposition.  Even with a derived relation, there has to be something from
> which it is derived.
Brian,

Sorry but I was not refering to the logical model but rather to a
computing model required for representing relations.  They are
separate concepts.  But thanks for bringing your insight.
> [snip]