Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.visyn.net!news2.arglkargh.de!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!news.germany.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!hwmnpeer01.phx!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx!newsfe12.phx.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <458C75F4.5404@cox.net>
From: Larry Coon <lmcoon_nospam@cox.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Hierarchal vs Non-Hierarchal Interfaces to Biological Taxonomy
References: <1166126176.587678.119920@t46g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <4581D951.2571@assist.org>   <pQlgh.33063$cz.493887@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>   <458C44D8.5C1@cox.net>   <OXXih.36387$cz.535949@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <1166827188.436596.159730@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1l_ih.36472$cz.536566@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 44
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:19:00 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.225.236.214
X-Complaints-To: admin@cox.net
X-Trace: newsfe12.phx 1166833140 68.225.236.214 (Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:19:00 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:19:00 MST
Organization: Cox
Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.theory:40532

Bob Badour wrote:

Answering several distinct posts at once here...

> >>Which opens the floor to: "How many species did you have
> >>before B went extinct?"

One.

> > These kinds of questions are always interesting. And they
> > often lead me to the same conclusion, which is that
> > the concept being discussed is a construct of the
> > human mind, and not of the natural world. The
> > very idea of "species" is an abstraction. A useful
> > one, but an abstraction nonetheless.

Correct.

> Here's an even better one: Suppose a retrovirus comes along that conveys
> some fitness advantage so that it becomes ubiquitous among a species:
> ducks for instance. Suppose as well that the virus crosses over from the
> domesticated duck population into pigs and humans where it too becomes
> ubiquitous.
> 
> At that point, humans, ducks and pigs all share a unique recent
> ancestor. Where does that put us in the taxonomy with ducks and pigs?

Your "at that point, humans, ducks and pigs all share a
unique recent ancestor" is an incorrect premise.  A
percentage of the human genome (I want to say 8%, but I
don't remember for sure) came from outside organisms
like virii, but that doesn't make them our ancestors.

A facinating and related topic is mitochondria.  There's
evidence that it was orignally a separate organism that
got incorporated into cells in a symbiotic relationship:
cells provide the sugars that mitochondria need, and
mitochondira provide the ATP that cells need.  So a
basic feature of eukariotic organisms (animals, plants
and fungi) was acquired.


Larry Coon
University of California
