Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!msrtrans!News.Dal.Ca!ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Bob Badour <bbadour@pei.sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Concurrency in an RDB
References: <1165544057.433915.4620@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>   <D55eh.30028$cz.451619@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>   <1165564572.553799.62710@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <RWdeh.30103$cz.453133@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>   <1165591612.441816.290650@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <2kgeh.30158$cz.453890@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>   <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612081732040.29400@gamera.ics.uci.edu> <1165912207.719331.162070@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <n2zfh.31897$cz.476390@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
In-Reply-To: <n2zfh.31897$cz.476390@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <MgAfh.31925$cz.476853@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:54:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.176.111.41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aliant.net
X-Trace: ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca 1165938860 142.176.111.41 (Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:54:20 AST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:54:20 AST
Organization: Sympatico-Subscriber
Xref: usenetserver.com comp.databases.theory:160374
X-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:54:21 EST (text.usenetserver.com)

Bob Badour wrote:

> monarodan@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> To all those stating that David should do some background reading - did
>> you bother to look into Operational Transform (OT) as mentioned by
>> David? There is potentially a whole new way of thinking about databases
>> and distributed systems that should not be ignored.
> 
> What's new about it? I saw nothing novel in his suggestion.

Let me clarify the question: How does David's operation transform 
proposal differ from "update anywhere-anytime-anyway" mentioned (not 
quite a decade ago) in:
http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?msr_tr_id=P115
