Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry Shuklin" <shuklin@bk.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Date: 7 Jul 2006 03:12:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <1152267163.111993.45910@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1151665732.555787.99350@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1151740631.102273.281450@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <1151921958.158158.310910@a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1151947251.883285.47990@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <1151948683.152997.326210@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1152116943.522272.5220@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1152128550.212098.266230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <%8erg.60479$Lm5.18587@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.44.11.114
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1152267167 32593 127.0.0.1 (7 Jul 2006 10:12:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <%8erg.60479$Lm5.18587@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; MRA 4.2 (build 01102); .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 TDS:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE9)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.44.11.114;
   posting-account=ua9U5A0AAADDwYqoZjPhhLPPd4d5lwKH
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases:48076 comp.databases.theory:43145

Hi Faux,

> Cache already supports everything you have listed

I know about MUMPS. It isn't support all. For example it isn't support
active object server with .NET on its side. I want to write methods for
objects on C# and execute them on server side. Also i don't like MUMPS.
Just don't like. So i don't want to use them. In any case it is
powerful technology, you are absolutelly right. I think that it is
better to use cache then SQL for neural network models. But in this
case plain C is more better )))

WBR,
Dmitry