Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "topmind" Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.databases.theory Subject: Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Date: 17 Jun 2006 17:39:31 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 30 Message-ID: <1150591171.749991.128600@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> References: <1148940908.338233.159400@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1148992382.953619.29870@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <2006053108462738165-unclebob@objectmentorcom> <1149084873.914054.188030@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1149093823.907589.226530@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1149154287.668637.302210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <1149159361.846295.4330@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <2006061315292642612-unclebob@objectmentorcom> <1150215123.463187.38320@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1150491274.626975.107970@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1150521624.848013.17980@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.232.75.203 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1150591175 32472 127.0.0.1 (18 Jun 2006 00:39:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 00:39:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.232.75.203; posting-account=s2SMxwwAAADq5QNoEfa1s_3moAPE7mxj Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.object:140514 comp.databases.theory:41674 Phlip wrote: > frebe wrote: > > >> To be fair, I think R. Martin tends to focus on industries where > >> reliability and testability are more important than being nimble. > > > > But it seem to me that he is not very interested in testing the SQL > > statements at all? > > Don't be so easily trolled. "Topmind" knows full well that Well hello to you also. > RCM focuses on > "nimble" situations, where lite programming efforts focus on > time-to-market. His website examples appear to be hardware-centric. I see very little custom business examples on his website. This is not 100% proof of what RCM focuses on, but it does back my stated speculation (and I did word it as speculation instead of fact). If you disagree, the civilized way is to provide evidence of what cases RCM does actually focus on. There is no need for name-calling. > -- > Phlip -T-