Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nf3.bellglobal.com!ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Bob Badour <bbadour@pei.sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations
 with RDBMS Persistence Models)
References: <1148940908.338233.159400@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <J03MMq.7oA@news.boeing.com>   <OI3fg.15244$A26.356280@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>   <2006053109211382327-unclebob@objectmentorcom>   <cZjfg.15572$A26.362911@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <1149096136.693762.90890@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1149096136.693762.90890@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <s5lfg.15604$A26.363273@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:18:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.176.111.68
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aliant.net
X-Trace: ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca 1149099480 142.176.111.68 (Wed, 31 May 2006 15:18:00 ADT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:18:00 ADT
Organization: Sympatico-Subscriber
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.object:139599 comp.databases.theory:40446

Mikito Harakiri wrote:

> Bob Badour wrote:
> 
>>Fowler is an idiot. Given two formal systems: one very powerful system
>>operating at the level of intent and the other very low-level system
>>obscuring intent, his solution is to cripple the powerful one down to
>>match low-level one.
> 
> This is kind of extreme statement. Reading Mr Fowler's "Refactoring"
> was a pleasant experience back in 97. I couldn't help exclaming "I
> should have written that!" Unfortunately, Fowler's recent voyage into
> data management area is disappointing.

I found what he wrote rather obvious and not too informative. It sounds 
like you found it rather obvious too. While 'idiot' might be too 
extreme, he is a lightweight at best.
