Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny05.POSTED!9244eeff!not-for-mail From: "David Cressey" Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory References: <9OCTf.2923$1U1.813@trndny05> <2ISTf.3660$tN3.3129@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <1143452308.856695.294440@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: More on lists and sets Lines: 15 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: <4%RVf.539$st.131@trndny05> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:44:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.127.4.129 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny05 1143467072 71.127.4.129 (Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:44:32 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:44:32 EST Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.theory:37613 "Brian Selzer" wrote in message news:R4RVf.59914$H71.43001@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > If a tuple with a list is deleted, the contents of the list is also deleted, > possibly snuffing out the only instance of that list in the database. This > may not be a problem in most cases, but wasn't this same scenario one of the > arguments for further normalization? Is this the same thing as what Dawn called the "ripple delete" in her blog?