Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "vc" <boston103@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: So what's null then if it's not nothing?
Date: 22 Dec 2005 12:52:31 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <1135284751.736656.196220@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <MPG.1e038418267e1485989737@news.ntnu.no>
   <mjvjp1p04cks0cimjmep5uvh8g9ek4p45n@4ax.com>
   <MPG.1e042990d2a1555798973c@news.ntnu.no>
   <mr6pp1dthae49qdiudmgcp8eh66tmve5pp@4ax.com>
   <1134354197.583597.21280@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <MPG.1e076afdc9b1f33898973f@news.ntnu.no>
   <ic81q1dv2f5948ekq43g1r9vp8co2mh9hm@4ax.com>
   <MPG.1e0b433358f3ec93989747@news.ntnu.no>
   <5fm3q11edj412gbk98h39sjagb8ksurtj0@4ax.com>
   <MPG.1e0c00ff7879215d98974f@news.ntnu.no>
   <4eqjq11u90jb81gon89nlfaq6elid3n4ik@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.244.78.22
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1135284756 17380 127.0.0.1 (22 Dec 2005 20:52:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4eqjq11u90jb81gon89nlfaq6elid3n4ik@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.244.78.22;
   posting-account=thIdtgwAAAAhUVpIR1L4IFjCXWRKlxtG
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.theory:35292

Hugo Kornelis wrote:
[...]
> And NULL should always propagate
> in logic - i.e. expr1 log-oper expr2 should always result in NULL if
> either expr1 or expr2 is NULL, regardless of the value of the other
> expression and regardless of the logical operator.

Then you have a four-valued logical mongrel half-Kleene's (or
Lukasiewicz's) and half-Bochvar's which you intend to use in an ad hoc
fashion without clearly understanding what each truth value  {true,
false, unknown, meaningless (aka NULL) } is supposed to model.  I am
not sure if anyone can find a system like that very useful..

>
> Or, to make a long story a lot shorter: I disagree with Codd's views aas
> outline in this paper.
>
> Best, Hugo
> -- 
> 
> (Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)

