Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "dawn" Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory Subject: Re: Just one more anecdote Date: 27 Jul 2005 20:36:36 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 20 Message-ID: <1122521796.286648.132040@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1122344688.525517.39350@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1122476883.931471.295040@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1122518820.608173.176090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.120.93.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1122521805 18568 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2005 03:36:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:36:45 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1122518820.608173.176090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.120.93.7; posting-account=fLxfag0AAADzmFPc_IBdM-stGY4WCEYa Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.theory:32509 Marshall Spight wrote: > dawn wrote: > > > > In order to get good, interesting, informed, alternative opinions from > > people like you, perhaps sometimes I lure you into my lair. > > Everyone watch out for her electric mace! so that I can keep it in my purse for now, would you be so kind as to arbitrate and let me know why David thinks "You are treating as proven something this audience generally does not accept" when I thought I was clear when I was stating an opinion and that I was making a conjecture and not stating a proven fact? We definitely have a communication gap on that one and I'm curious to know where it is. Thanks in advance. --dawn