Re: Modelling Considered Harmful

From: <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com>
Date: 25 Apr 2005 19:51:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1114483883.389299.110970_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

http://depts.washington.edu/rfpk/training/tutorials/modeling/part1/03.html

the RM meets this definition.

and, anyway, what's the alternative; perpetual ad hoc-ery a la the XML process? or IMS? or faith based computing? or computational eschatology? alchemy?

btdb Received on Tue Apr 26 2005 - 04:51:23 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Modelling Considered Harmful"
Previous message: Kenneth Downs: "Re: the relational model of data objects *and* program objects"
In reply to: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Modelling Considered Harmful"
Next in thread: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Modelling Considered Harmful"
Reply: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Modelling Considered Harmful"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message