Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.hanau.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news2.telebyte.nl!teleglobe.net!teleglobe.net!62.81.31.29.MISMATCH!cyclone.auna.com!news-feeder.eresmas.com!news-reader.eresmas.com!not-for-mail
From: alfredo@ncs.es (Alfredo Novoa)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: VIEWS compared to Nodes as Windows into data
Message-ID: <409161cb.223050@news.wanadoo.es>
References: <c6m06j$r1h$1@news.netins.net> <c6r0tc$9f5$1@news.netins.net> <8amdnchXd-hQlgzdRVn-vw@comcast.com> <40911d8c.18821003@news.wanadoo.es> <gtqdnY0ygcevrAzdRVn-tA@comcast.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 10
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:13:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.37.91.244
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eresmas.com
X-Trace: news-reader.eresmas.com 1083269981 62.37.91.244 (Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:19:41 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:19:41 MET DST
Organization: eresMas
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.theory:26091

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:46:35 -0400, "Laconic2" <laconic2@comcast.net>
wrote:

>
>> The strongest reason is obsolete DBMS design.
>
>For comparison purposes, could you give an example of a DBMS design that is
>not obsolete?

The one I am developing :)