Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.netins.net!not-for-mail
From: "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt@tincat-group.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: c.d.theory glossary - proposed preamble
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:16:10 -0500
Organization: netINS InterNetNews site
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <c6cm6f$eep$1@news.netins.net>
References: <407edfea$0$562$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1pidnW7zDqkRMRzdRVn-uw@comcast.com> <Tdtgc.75844$vO4.5098632@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <40826a52$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <34519632.0404181718.212a7c55@posting.google.com> <34519632.0404230950.257ba452@posting.google.com> <4089a3c8$0$568$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <kmiic.1409$17.168741@news1.epix.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.120.93.7
X-Trace: news.netins.net 1082776591 14809 199.120.93.7 (24 Apr 2004 03:16:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@netins.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 03:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.theory:25885

"Senny" <sennomo@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kmiic.1409$17.168741@news1.epix.net...
> Wat???  Ik begrijp niet.  Ik ken niet Lakatos, von Bertalanffy, Barthes,
> en Canetti.  I wonder if I would understand your post better in Dutch.

Nee.  Ik denk 't niet.
(I don't know if that is correct Dutch-- I'm third generation)

I think its just a mood and we can help by jumpstarting the vocabulary
effort again.  It shouldn't be too hard to get a primary definition for
relation, for example, even if we have to have some secondary versions too.
I just re-read an early Codd paper and he really does start with a pretty
standard mathematical definition of a relation.  It gets
expanded/altered/corrupted over time to get to where it seems to be today.
So, if we start with what a typical relational theory definition would be
and then have "mathematical relation" as a standard mathematical def, we
might get on a roll.  Given I'm not exactly a relational theorist, I'll
yield the floor to someone with more of a clue.

Maybe start a separate thread for each word we define, with subject
"Glossary - Relation" for example -- just a thought.

cheers!  --dawn


