Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!thewolery.demon.co.uk!thewolery
From: "Anthony W. Youngman" <thewolery@nospam.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory,comp.databases.pick
Subject: Re: foundations of relational theory?
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:05:30 +0000
Organization: vinny-puch
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <0iceBLA6rBn$EwIs@thewolery.demon.co.uk>
References: <1efdad5b.0309260259.393522ae@posting.google.com>
 <ba87a3cf.0310131254.66a641ba@posting.google.com>
 <6db906b2.0310131929.ae22604@posting.google.com>
 <nRMib.566$7a4.75@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <DxPib.92732$pl3.2925@pd7tw3no> <bmgm7j$1ouu$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
 <eTVib.95508$6C4.76722@pd7tw1no> <oMGdnX_xJpsFqhGiU-KYvA@golden.net>
 <z87jb.101186$9l5.78520@pd7tw2no>
 <6db906b2.0310191644.13b47642@posting.google.com>
 <bn15ap$g1a$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
 <6db906b2.0310202027.58324c36@posting.google.com>
 <bn33eu$12j0$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
 <BhNnjiArEal$EwOo@thewolery.demon.co.uk>
 <bn5s7p$1grg$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
 <T1ljmMCJ9ul$EwsP@thewolery.demon.co.uk>
 <bn8njp$1n8k$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
Reply-To: "Anthony W. Youngman" <compp@thewolery.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: thewolery.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1067203056 13586 158.152.222.21 (26 Oct 2003 21:17:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 21:17:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U <kadi9FnjOBL6XNAiRMnYuwUxdX>
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.theory:22101 comp.databases.pick:76503

In article <bn8njp$1n8k$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>, Paul Vernon
<paul.vernon@ukk.ibmm.comm> writes
>"Anthony W. Youngman" <thewolery@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:T1ljmMCJ9ul$EwsP@thewolery.demon.co.uk...
>> EXCEPT this was an ACADEMIC study, not a MARKETING study, and as I
>> understand it, the researchers were surprised by the result.
>>
>> They picked a bunch of large companies with the idea of calculating db
>> spend as a proportion of turnover. No bias there. They plotted those two
>> figures, and were surprised to get a double peak. No bias there, either.
>>
>> When they investigated this unusual phenomenon, they discovered the low-
>> spending peak was almost entirely Pick-based dbs, the high-spending peak
>> was relational.
>
>What did they expect? If Pick was as expensive to run as Oracle, then nobody
>in their right mind would run it.
>
>I.e.  It's market niche is low cost and low functionality.
>
>Or are you saying that it is as *functional* as an Oracle or DB2, and the
>only reason that it has not taken over the world is that old war horse:
>'poor marketing' ?!
>
Actually, YES!

Cheers,
Wol
-- 
Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk
Witches are curious by definition and inquisitive by nature. She moved in. "Let 
me through. I'm a nosey person.", she said, employing both elbows.
Maskerade : (c) 1995 Terry Pratchett
