Path: news.easynews.com!core-easynews!newsfeed1.easynews.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed.news2me.com!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: neo55592@hotmail.com (Neo)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
Date: 4 May 2003 19:26:50 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0305041826.2719ebda@posting.google.com>
References: <17ce58cf.0304240518.34ebfe22@posting.google.com> <4b45d3ad.0305011433.5ae8baa4@posting.google.com> <3EB1AA25.50307@atbusiness.com> <4b45d3ad.0305021332.436c1d36@posting.google.com> <b8uq55$dut5f$1@ID-152540.news.dfncis.de> <4b45d3ad.0305021821.63987210@posting.google.com> <b90hab$ee88r$1@ID-152540.news.dfncis.de> <4b45d3ad.0305031323.2e4bbce0@posting.google.com> <b92vc2$7r7$1@sparta.btinternet.com> <4b45d3ad.0305041240.3b98d435@posting.google.com> <b9419r$1ir$1@sparta.btinternet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.98.160.243
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1052101610 5396 127.0.0.1 (5 May 2003 02:26:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 May 2003 02:26:50 GMT
Xref: core-easynews comp.databases.theory:26164
X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 19:26:19 MST (news.easynews.com)

> > My personal definition of a binary relation is
> > 'Two things that have something in common'.
> 
> Offering your personal (re-)definition of basic concepts in mathematics is a
> counter-productive response.

It is mathematics that has inaccurately redefined the meaning of the
word relation, not I. The word was find used to mean "person related
by blood or marriage". Now does this sound like "two things that have
something in common" or does this sound like "a set of ordered pairs"
or "the subset of AxB".

It does not matter much who defined it or when they defined it.
What matters most is that the definition is accurate for the concept.
