Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!wn11feed!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri@yeehu.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory,comp.databases.rdb,comp.databases.oracle.misc
References: <2ee07259.0301280744.582e4b7c@posting.google.com> <c0d87ec0.0301281554.581797ee@posting.google.com> <2ee07259.0301290412.5eb3290a@posting.google.com> <c0d87ec0.0301291315.7ae946eb@posting.google.com> <2ee07259.0301310449.2cbc1468@posting.google.com> <c0d87ec0.0302011323.6b6e9e7f@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: double linked list
Lines: 30
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <Ml2%9.58105$to3.82811@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.236.17.145
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1044165100 12.236.17.145 (Sun, 02 Feb 2003 05:51:40 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 05:51:40 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 05:51:40 GMT
Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.theory:24570 comp.databases.rdb:2103 comp.databases.oracle.misc:92597
X-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 22:50:58 MST (news.easynews.com)

"--CELKO--" <71062.1056@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:c0d87ec0.0302011323.6b6e9e7f@posting.google.com...
> >> Currently I figure to use
>
>    SELECT cs, cb, level
>      FROM link_t
>     START WITH cb
>               IN (SELECT cb
>                     FROM link_t
>                    WHERE cs = 'A')
>   CONNECT BY PRIOR cb = cs;
>
> that will return a tree containing all paths with the root as the
> common starting point. <<
>
> It returns a sequential file that represents a table and that
> represernation  depends on the order of the records (they are no
> longer rows in a table).

Looks like we won't see a "connect-by" chapter in your book;-)

In addition to

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bdf69bdf.02
08011026.9caa07a%40posting.google.com

I would mention that there is a striking syntactic and semantic similarity
between "connect-by" and "group-by"...


