Path: news.easynews.com!easynews!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!feeder.qis.net!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: jraustin1@hotmail.com (James)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: What are the limits to the usefulness of normalization?
Date: 31 Dec 2001 21:20:14 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <a6e74506.0112312120.91bf3ad@posting.google.com>
References: <ca9a87de.0112170347.292d9d65@posting.google.com> <k05Y7.8$Ba6.1215632@radon.golden.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.172.146.99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1009862415 16861 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2002 05:20:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jan 2002 05:20:15 GMT
Xref: easynews comp.databases.theory:19381
X-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 02:26:19 MST (news.easynews.com)

> Oh dear, Dwaun!
Translation: You are a close significant of mine.

> I apologize for not following this newsgroup as much as I would like. I see
> that all of the previous answers you received to your question were not only
> incorrect but dangerously incorrect.
Translation: I look damn good in the mirror and you are lucky to have
my presense.

> Sadly, vendors have (so far) failed to provide adequate independence between
> the logical model and physical layout of the data, and few practitioners
> know or can appreciate the distinction between the conceptual and logical
> levels of discourse. Subsequently, both vendors and practitioners frequently
> blame normalization for their own failings.
Translation: I could do it better if I wanted to but it is easier to
look down my nose and also you and others are dumb.

> I would direct you to "C. J. Date, _Relational Database Writings 1991-1994_,
> I would also direct you to Fabian Pascal's latest book _Practical Issues in
Translation: Here are some books that I wrote for dummies like you
because there is no way you understood what the heck I just explained
to you.

All kidding aside, Bob's tirade was surgically correct with respect to
rdbs. See www.xdb1.com/Normalization.asp for equivalent from an oodb's
point-of-view.
