Path: news.easynews.com!easynews!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Ray Cassick \(work\)" <ray.cassick@intel.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: use of Mixed DB types.
Lines: 7
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <K4bK7.12433$ym4.541862@iad-read.news.verio.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:13:38 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.152.228.5
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net
X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 1006189994 146.152.228.5 (Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:13:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:13:14 GMT
Organization: Verio
Xref: easynews comp.databases.theory:18996
X-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:00:08 MST (news.easynews.com)

I see examples quite often where people say that a OO Database would work
better for one situation than another, or vice versa... Has anyone done any
design patterns that took advantage of BOTH types of databases (OO and
Relational) within the same solution? Is this feasible?