Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
From: Aloha Kakuikanu <nospam@newsranger.com>
References: <%zFI6.1690$vg1.141759@www.newsranger.com> <3af34a5d$0$14444$1dc6e903@news.corecomm.net>
Subject: Re: is concat a group by function?
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <apII6.1856$vg1.154296@www.newsranger.com>
X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 21:09:26 EDT
Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 01:09:26 GMT


In article <3af34a5d$0$14444$1dc6e903@news.corecomm.net>, Carlos Bromanski
says...
>
>Do what? Please describe what result you're trying to get.
>CONCAT is not an aggregate function. (not in Chicago, anyway)

The query is supposed to return:

MGR     EMP
------  --------
Newton  Gauss, Hilbert
Euclid  Einstein


>Aloha Kakuikanu <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
>news:%zFI6.1690$vg1.141759@www.newsranger.com...
>> SELECT
>> MGR,
>> CONCAT( EMPNO ) || ','
>> FROM SCOTT.EMP
>> group by MGR
>>
>> doesn't work, of course. Any other way to do it?
>>
>>
>>
>
>



