Path: news.easynews.com!core-easynews!newsfeed3.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.glorb.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: subs@robtudor.co.uk (Rob)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle
Subject: Windows v Unix Performance on Oracle 9i
Date: 5 May 2004 07:15:48 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <cd6e7d58.0405050615.5947cd17@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 155.136.80.25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1083766549 9634 127.0.0.1 (5 May 2004 14:15:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 14:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: core-easynews comp.databases.oracle:27528
X-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 07:15:23 MST (news.easynews.com)

Does anyone know if there are any good comparisons between Windows and
Unix performance?  Or does anyone have examples of Oracle databases
running large numbers (200+) of concurrent users.  I am trying to
investigate what size implementations can be placed onto Windows 2000
/ Windows 2003 as opposed to UNIX but cannot find much data.

Any information would be much appreciated.

Cheers.