From: lancegrieb@yahoo.com (TX-DBA)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc,comp.databases.oracle.tools,comp.databases,comp.databases.theory,comp.databases.oracle
Subject: Re: ERwin vs. Visio
Date: 26 Apr 2002 11:40:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <a95941b3.0204261040.d1f16a6@posting.google.com>
References: <e4fbf364.0204171834.794ea613@posting.google.com> <3CBEFB76.9EB33D8E@exesolutions.com> <rbEv8.4858$p%3.3024845038@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <a9or6g$52a7r$1@ID-71391.news.dfncis.de> <MPG.1731f8e2aa032f98989702@news.easynews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 140.140.58.8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1019846443 15398 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 18:40:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2002 18:40:43 GMT


Been using ER/Studio by Embarcadero for sometime and it has many of
the same capabilities as the other tools. It also has a bridge to
relate UML and ER model views.

Don't know if its better or worse then Visio or Erwin but thought I
would add another possible alternative to the issue.


http://www.embarcadero.com/products/erstudio/index.asp