From: Mark D Stock Subject: Re: a comparison of different databases Date: 1996/07/07 Message-ID: <31E0735A.6C60@west.co.za>#1/1 references: <31D94208.6359@dsi.ing.unifi.it> <31DAAFC3.7AC6@dircon.co.uk> <31DC0CB4.2502@dircon.co.uk> <4rk102$ht3@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <31DF63FB.DB8@west.co.za> <31E059A4.16ED@batelco.com.bh> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: The West Solutions Group mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.databases.ms-sqlserver,comp.databases.oracle,comp.databases.sybase,comp.databases.informix,comp.databases,comp.databases.ibm-db2 x-mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) Adel Al-Shaikh wrote: > Hi There, > > When It comes to problems ask MS Access users, the Access community has > the largest number of problems to solve, and by studying there > behaviour, you can be sure that more traffic dose not mean more problems > to solve, because Access users have learned to be quite and inactive, > ALL BECAUSE OF PROBLEMS!!!!! > > Well, the serious part is that in my company, We have done a thourogh > comparison betwwen Oracle, MS Sql Server, and Informix. Informix is old > bulky technology, MS Sql Server is a joke, Oracle is the way for serious > developers database solutions (Full Stop) 'old bulky technology'?? Which version did you evaluate... version 4.00? The Online engine has just been written from scratch, using all the latest multi-threaded technology. Take a look at version 7.20, then tell us Oracle is still the way to go! -- Mark. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Mark D. Stock - The West Solutions Group http://www.west.co.za | | | |Email: marks@west.co.za +------------------------------------------------+ |Tel: +27 11 803 2151 |If it doesn't work... force it! | |Fax: +27 11 803 2189 |If it breaks... it needed replacing anyway! | |Cell: +27 83 250 2325 |Well, that's how I code anyway! | +------------------------+------------------------------------------------+