From: timr@cerrera.uk.sun.com (Tim Read - Sun Linlithgow - Principal SE and DB Specialist)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle
Subject: Re: Oracle and Disk Mirroring
Date: 8 Aug 1994 08:23:22 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems (UK)
Lines: 22
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <324q1q$p3t@uk-usenet.uk.sun.com>
References: <Cu2t8M.EC5@world.std.com>
Reply-To: timr@cerrera.uk.sun.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: cerrera.uk.sun.com


My figure for 3.28MB/sec is probably a very bad example (never post on 
Fridays!). The figure is derived from the maximum fully random raw disk 
read rate that the system is capable of, i.e 1680 operations per second 
times 2k which is the sort of read size that Oracle will issue with a 
default installation. Multiplying these figures together you get 3.28MB/sec.

Compare this with the sequential performance through the file system. The 
system is capable of **16.6MB/sec** although 18.7MB/sec has been measured 
at the cost of increased I/O latency.

You need to be clear what sort of I/O your application will use to pick the
right I/O figure. For databases this is almost always *RANDOM* access.

There is a whitepaper from Sun detailing all of this for people who want 
to know more.

Hope this makes things clearer.

Tim
---



