Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!news.tiscali.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news2.euro.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:45:54 -0700 From: DA Morgan Organization: Puget Sound Oracle Users Group User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools,comp.databases.oracle.misc Subject: Re: oracle 10g installation - access not permitted? References: <1180955648.122213.304310@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1180964477.089705.79840@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1180971953.288126@bubbleator.drizzle.com> Cache-Post-Path: bubbleator.drizzle.com!unknown@216.162.218.178 X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Lines: 22 X-Complaints-To: abuse@csolutions.net Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.oracle.tools:35817 comp.databases.oracle.misc:79779 Charles T. Smith wrote: > As far as my suggestion at one point that there might be a bug in the > Oracle procedure - I think it was clear that I thought that unlikely. But > to suggest that it is *ridiculous* brings images of exploding space > shuttles to mind. Clearly ~40% of the RDBMS market has managed to install Oracle and not have the problem you are having. It is not a bug when you don' follow the published docs and, instead, kludge something together on your own from four separate sets of instructions. Well at least it isn't a bug in Oracle. You've now spent more time posting on this than it would have taken to do it properly: Far more. -- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.org