Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Axel Seinsche Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools Subject: Re: jdeveloper, bc4j, and jdbc question Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 07:59:50 +0100 Organization: T-Online Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1046674735 07 20220 jrDmE47ESMAto9 030303 06:58:55 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-ID: ZjyufeZfwejxwx2lKxhVr4scpt6AIJ6ZeHcGUpcCgxTGibfCL2GBQc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.tools:57243 X-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:57 MST (news.easynews.com) Ryan wrote: > Prior to 9i, jdeveloper did not write very good JDBC code, if you made > changes to the originial design, you had to re-write alot of the jdbc code. > > how is it now? Havent used it at work yet, just learning it at home. > > any opinions? Does it need another generation before the BC4J abstraction is > really production level quality? > > JDeveloper works fine in my opinion. There is a nice feature called "Synchronize" that allows to synchronize the BC4J layer with the database. So give it a try.