From: Brian Peasland Subject: Re: Oracle's JDeveloper any good? Date: 2000/08/08 Message-ID: <399018A7.A5916BB9@edcmail.cr.usgs.gov>#1/1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news@igsrsparc2.er.usgs.gov (Janet Walz (GD) x6739) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: edcntw241.cr.usgs.gov References: <8mle49$1s5$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8mn54i$j7j$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Raytheon Systems Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools hxn1@my-deja.com wrote: > > i heard it is based on Borland's JBuilder- > if that's true, then it's pretty good. > I used PowerJ, VisualAge and JBuilder, > and think JBuilder is the best among them. JDeveloper is built right around JBuilder. Oracle bought the rights from Inprise (formerly Borland) to use JBuilder as a basis for JDeveloper. I've found that while JBuilder Professional has the tools necessary to create database apps, JDeveloper does it a little more nicely. Personally, I'd use either one as both are good tools. Just my 3.14159265 cents worth, Brian -- ======================================== Brian Peasland Raytheons Systems at USGS EROS Data Center These opinions are my own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of my company! ========================================