Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.tools:33418
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!chicago-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.itis.com!tower.itis.com!encephal
From: "Andrew L. Garman" <encephal@chorus.net>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools,comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Oracle and Veritas
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 12:39:35 -0500
Organization: IntraNet Inc: Madison, Wisconsin's ISP
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.991010122936.23318A-100000@tower.itis.com>
References: <37FCCE12.F2E3EE87@bmo.com> <7tj0m8$9df$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <Pine.SUN.3.96.991008114828.21884C-100000@tower.itis.com> <7tlnpk$8qe$1@carlton.cubbyhole.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: encephal@tower.itis.com
In-Reply-To: <7tlnpk$8qe$1@carlton.cubbyhole.com>

> > The database edition really improves Direct (ie, synchronous) I/O access
> > for the database.

> Is this still true?  I thought Solaris 2.6 had changes to the UFS file 
> system to make databases on partitions almost as fast as raw devices?

	Sun's UFS+ with logging, direct I/O, etc will probably be pretty
slow in comparison.  Mostly, VxFS being an extent based filesystem has
major advantages for synchronous sequential writes to start with.  UFS+
still uses Inode to Datablock allocation, which requires many inode
lookups before reaching the data.  And the datablocks aren't likely
contiguous on the disk.  Whereas with an Extent based file system, you
have a single inode pointing to multiple MB of data all of which is
contiguous.

	VxFS Quick I/O for Oracle also provides customized caching that
improves Oracle disk access.  This will enable better than raw performance
on synchronous I/O, between 120-180% according to reports I've read,
though I've not seen it in operation.  The first version gave about 98% of
Raw performance, which was better than I could get from tweaked UFS+.

	There is no asynchronous I/O on raw Solaris devices.

> And now with priority paging, shouldn't that level the playing field even 
> more?

	Priority paging wouldn't be an advantage to UFS+ at least not one
that VxFS doesn't benefit from as well.  

Regards,

Andrew Garman
Bluestone Consulting, inc.

