From: openshaw@airmail.net (Mike Openshaw)
Subject: Re: Reports good for reports?
Date: 1997/01/01
Message-ID: <32cade3a.2763716@news.airmail.net>#1/1
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961231161039.23231A-100000@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: INTERNET AMERICA
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.tools



John L Dunn <misioror@gas.uug.arizona.edu> wrote:

>1. How good is Reports at creating report output? 
>2. I've seen postings that it is a buggy product, quirky, etc. Is this true?
>3. How hard is Reports to learn? To master? 
>4. What other alternatives should I consider?
>5. How much hot air is the "develop once, deploy wherever" mantra?

SQL*Reports Version 2.5 is a very robust report writer; however, it is
somewhat difficult to learn and master, particularly the separate
Graphics component.  Also, it's performance leaves much to be desired.

Another tool worth looking at would be Crystal Reports; very
fast.productive, and easy to use tool. Export capabilities and ease of
deployment also favor Crystal.  I can do in hours with Crystal what
takes days in SQL*Reports.  However, Crystal Reports isn't quite as
robust; given my druthers, I'd use Crystal if I could, SQL Reports if
I had to. 


