Re: LOB compression
From: TheBoss <TheBoss_at_invalid.nl>
Date: 01 Aug 2011 21:04:43 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns9F34EAC54B818TheBossUsenet_at_194.109.133.246>
Mladen Gogala <no_at_email.here.invalid> wrote in news:pan.2011.08.01.16.11.53 _at_email.here.invalid:
>
> That is why my management asked me to find a way to decrease the number
> of Oracle licenses. I first was investigating PgSQL, but that was a dud.
> I'm in the process of investigating MongoDB for our DW, which would
> likely relinquish some RAC and partitioning licenses. Oracle became so
> darned expensive that this project got the highest priority.
>
>
Date: 01 Aug 2011 21:04:43 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns9F34EAC54B818TheBossUsenet_at_194.109.133.246>
Mladen Gogala <no_at_email.here.invalid> wrote in news:pan.2011.08.01.16.11.53 _at_email.here.invalid:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:26:46 -0700, Mark D Powell wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, a lot of the better new features are all extra-cost >> options. It can be pretty difficult to keep track of what is OK to use >> since so much of the extra-charge items come included with the database >> like the AWR. It is there and Oracle automatically collects data but if >> you want to look at it you need the EM Diagnostic and/or Performance >> Pack options.
>
> That is why my management asked me to find a way to decrease the number
> of Oracle licenses. I first was investigating PgSQL, but that was a dud.
> I'm in the process of investigating MongoDB for our DW, which would
> likely relinquish some RAC and partitioning licenses. Oracle became so
> darned expensive that this project got the highest priority.
>
>
Maybe DB2 can be a viable alternative?
From 9.7 onwards it has a rather good "Oracle compatibility mode", so you
can run existing PL/SQL with almost no changes.
HTH
-- JeroenReceived on Mon Aug 01 2011 - 16:04:43 CDT